The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
470
Page
1 of 10
Released decisions470 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ12009010 →Jun 23, 2026 · Long BeachPanel decision
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB granted reconsideration in part, amending the order in ADJ3719477 to have applicant reevaluated by AME Dr. Mitchell U. Silverman and finding the Petition to Reopen timely filed in ADJ10346752; otherwise affirming the WCJ's decision.
Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of the February 1, 2021 Findings is dismissed as untimely. Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of the March 19, 2026 Decision is denied.
Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration is granted; final decision after reconsideration is deferred pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
Petition for reconsideration dismissed as not from a final order; petition for removal granted; WCJ's order rescinded; matter to proceed off calendar for further record development.
Vacated the arbitration Findings and Order issued August 28, 2018; rescinded the Order joining UEBTF; returned the matter to trial level for further proceedings.
Petitions for Reconsideration filed by applicant are dismissed as not aggrieved and because the Notice of Intention to Compel is not a final order or decision.
The Board rescinded the July 5, 2022 Findings and Order, substituted new findings and orders, and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Petition for removal dismissed as moot and for lack of aggrievement; C&R approved by WCJ; no action occurred prior to removal request; admonishment issued to attorneys for filing frivolous petition.
The August 16, 2021 F&O is rescinded and substituted with a new F&O finding injury AOE/COE to multiple body parts and entitlement to an additional QME panel in internal medicine; all other issues deferred.
Findings and Orders of December 12, 2025, and Finding and Order Re: Second QME Panel rescinded; panel 7875837 stricken as untimely; all other issues deferred; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings.
Findings and Order issued March 11, 2021 rescinded; defendants estopped from raising statute of limitations defense; all other issues deferred; case returned to trial level for further proceedings.
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as untimely and therefore the Appeals Board lacks jurisdiction to consider it; alternatively, if considered on merits, Petition would be denied.
The Petition for Reconsideration is granted, the WCJ's Findings of Fact and Orders of October 14, 2025 are affirmed except amended to order the parties to determine if Dr. Frederic Newton is still willing to act as the AME with specified billing rates for medical record review, medical research, and report writing.
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as the order under review was non-final and interlocutory, not determining substantive rights or threshold issues.
The Appeals Board granted defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the September 9, 2025 Findings and Award, and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.