The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The WCAB granted the Petition for Reconsideration, affirmed the Findings of Fact and Orders issued by the WCJ on June 23, 2025, and amended Finding 2 to clarify that the applicant was providing a benefit to the employer at the time of injury under Labor Code section 3600(a)(2).
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The Petition for Reconsideration filed by defendant is denied, affirming the WCJ's findings of industrial injury and the substantiality of the AME Dr. Bertoldi's medical evidence, and rejecting the claim of impermissible ex parte contact.
The Appeals Board grants applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and defers final decision after reconsideration pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
Petition for removal granted; WCJ's F&O rescinded and replaced; replacement neurology QME panel affirmed; matter remanded for further proceedings on remaining issues.
The WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's April 8, 2021 decision that defendant may not unilaterally cease inpatient care services at Casa Colina until a change in circumstances warrants a new utilization review determination.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's Findings of Fact and Award, dismissed defendant's petitions for reconsideration and removal, and denied the requests for disqualification of the WCJ.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's December 30, 2019 Findings and Award, holding that defendant's UR determination was untimely and invalid, and that applicant is entitled to continuing outpatient rehabilitation services until no longer reasonably required.