The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
37
Page
1 of 1
Released decisions37 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ11351201 →May 7, 2026 · Los AngelesPanel decision
The WCAB rescinded the WCJ's Findings and Order and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the opinion after reconsideration.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Petition for Reconsideration by defendant is denied, affirming the December 1, 2025 Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration and Decision after Reconsideration.
The WCJ's Findings and Order of September 22, 2025, is rescinded and the matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's August 18, 2025 Findings and Order, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Petition for Reconsideration granted in part; WCJ's decision affirmed except for amendment to include express finding of Labor Code section 5412 date of injury as August 2, 2017; The Hartford dismissed without prejudice
The WCAB granted defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's October 4, 2024 decision, and substituted new findings that the application ADJ18451814 was not duplicative of ADJ12117806, the presumption of compensability under Labor Code section 5402(b) does not apply, Dr. Jeffrey Nerenberg was validly obtained as QME, and discovery has not closed in ADJ18451814.
The Board denied Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the Findings and Award that applicant sustained injury AOE/COE and is entitled to medical treatment.
Findings and Award issued on March 18, 2019, affirmed except amended to find industrial injury to neck, back, and left shoulder; date of injury under Labor Code section 5412 is April 7, 2016; issues of injury to other body parts, permanent disability, apportionment, and attorney's fees deferred.
The WCAB granted defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the September 22, 2022 Finding and Order, and found that the applicant's injury is not presumed compensable under Labor Code section 5402. All other issues were deferred to the trial level.
The WCAB granted the Petition for Reconsideration, affirmed the Findings of Fact & Order except to defer the issues of neurological and circadian system injuries, and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings.
Petition for Reconsideration granted in part to amend injury findings by deferring all body parts; Petition denied as to post termination defense; January 25, 2022 Findings and Order otherwise affirmed
Petition for Reconsideration is denied, affirming the prior Findings of Fact & Orders that petitioner failed to prove employment and injury and failed to comply with discovery orders.
Petition for reconsideration granted; WCJ's June 21, 2021 Findings of Fact and Orders rescinded; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings and new decision.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's finding that the applicant's psychiatric injury was caused by a sudden and extraordinary employment condition and thus not barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d).