Where this sits
- Chapter 4.5.
- Division of Workers' Compensation
- Subchapter 1. Administrative Director--Administrative Rules
- Article 3.5. Medical Provider Networks
The regulation, as printed
The statute above this rule
Every regulation names the Labor Code it was written under. This is where the two halves of the law meet.
ImplementsLabor Code § 4616Labor Code § 4616.2
Authority and history
Note: Authority cited: Sections 133, 4616(h) and 4062, Labor Code. Reference: Sections 4616 and 4616.2, Labor Code.
What panels did with this rule
Released decisions that named § 9767.9, with the passage each turned on. A panel decision persuades; it does not bind.
- ADJ17164621 · 2024-06-17 · Anaheim District Office8 CCR § 9767.9
Determinative passage · p.8and decision by the WCJ. Should the WCJ determine in subsequent proceedings that defendant has neglected or refused medical treatment to the applicant, applicant would be entitled to continue to treat outside defendant's MPN at employer expense until such time as the defendant has complied with the transfer of care protocols required by Administrative Director Rule 9767.9 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 9767.9.)
Referenced for remedy if neglect or refusal is found in further proceedings.
Official decision · page 8 → - ADJ808475 · 2023-08-25 · Van Nuys District Office8 CCR § 9767.9
Determinative passage · p.2The injured employee may be transferred into the MPN for medical treatment unless certain exceptions apply. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 9767.9(a).) One exception allows an additional year of treatment outside the MPN when the injured employee has a serious chronic condition. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 9767.9(e)(2).) Applicant was provided with an additional year of treatment outside of the MPN due to his serious chronic condition. (Report, pp. 3-4.)
Defendant followed the required steps for transfer to MPN, and applicant received proper notice and additional time for treatment outside the MPN due to a serious chronic condition.
Official decision · page 2 → - ADJ11059073 · 2023-01-17 · Anaheim District Office8 CCR § 9767.9
Determinative passage · p.5Cal.Comp.Cases 70, 71 (Appeals Board en banc).) Administrative Director (AD) Rule 9767.9
Defendant must comply with transfer of care provisions and provide proper MPN notice to transfer applicant's care into the MPN.
Official decision · page 5 → - ADJ13514659 · 2022-04-11 · Anaheim District Office8 CCR § 9767.9
Determinative passage · p.5An employer must provide an injured worker with medical treatment that is reasonably required to cure or relieve the worker from the effects of an industrial injury. (Lab. Code, § 4600 (a).) An employer may establish an MPN for the provision of medical treatment to its injured employees and may transfer an injured employee's care into an MPN for medical treatment so long as it complies with the applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. (Lab. Code. § 4616, Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 9767.9); (Bobbitt v. Ow Jing dba National Market (2007) 72 Cal.Comp.Cases 70 (en banc).) At any time prior to the injury, the employee has the right to predesignate a personal physician for treatment in case of an injury; that physician need not be part of the MPN. (Lab. Code. § 4600 (d); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8. § 9780.1.)
The employer's establishment of an MPN and notification obligations were evaluated.
Official decision · page 5 → - ADJ12729922 · 2021-09-17 · Pomona District Office8 CCR § 9767.9
Determinative passage · p.4Administrative Director (AD) Rule 9767.9 provides for the transfer of ongoing care into
Governs the transfer of ongoing care into an MPN and the required process and notifications.
Official decision · page 4 → - ADJ11005277 · 2021-03-15 · Oakland District Office8 CCR § 9767.9
Determinative passage · p.12Therefore, although it had not been answered by the time of the first hearing on September 11, 2020 (when the parties were ordered to ask for the QME's assessment of the seriousness and chronicity of applicant's condition), the question of applicant's entitlement to the proposed surgery was answered by UR on September 12, 2020, and that answer was available by the time of the hearing on December 10, 2020. The applicable regulation provides for continuity of care when surgery has been "recommended and documented by the provider to occur within 180 days from the MPN coverage effective date." The MPN coverage date i.e., when defendant first acquired the right to transfer applicant's treatment to its MPN was July 1, 2020. The surgery was requested on September 8, 2020, and approved on September 23, 2020. Those dates are well within 180 days of one another.
Provides for continuity of care when surgery is recommended within 180 days of MPN coverage effective date.
Official decision · page 12 →
Rules beside this one
Article 3.5. Medical Provider Networks — regulations rarely stand alone, and the answer is often two sections away.
- § 9767.3Application for a Medical Provider Network Plan.2 decisions
- § 9767.4Cover Page for Medical Provider Network Application or Plan for Reapproval.
- § 9767.5Access Standards9 decisions
- § 9767.6Treatment and Change of Physicians Within MPN6 decisions
- § 9767.7Second and Third Opinions1 decisions
- § 9767.8Modification of Medical Provider Network Plan