Where this sits
- TITLE 8. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DIVISION 1. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CHAPTER 1. DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION-QUALIFIED MEDICAL EVALUATOR
- Article 3. Assignment of Qualified Medical Evaluators, Evaluation Procedure
The regulation, as printed
The statute above this rule
Every regulation names the Labor Code it was written under. This is where the two halves of the law meet.
ImplementsLabor Code § 4060Labor Code § 4061Labor Code § 4062Labor Code § 4062.1Labor Code § 4062.2Labor Code § 4062.3Labor Code § 4064Labor Code § 4067
Authority and history
Note: Authority cited: Sections 133, 139.2, 4061, 4062 and 5307.3, Labor Code. Reference: Sections 139.2, 4060, 4061, 4062, 4062.1, 4062.2, 4062.3, 4064 and 4067, Labor Code.
1. New article 3 and section filed 8-1-94; operative 8-31-94 (Register 94, No. 31). 2. Amendment of subsection (b) and new subsections (d)-(e) filed 8-23-96; operative 9-22-96 (Register 96, No. 34). 3. Amendment of subsections (a), (c) and (d)(1) filed 4-14-2000; operative 5-14-2000 (Register 2000, No. 15). 4. Amendment of section and Note filed 1-13-2009; operative 2-17-2009 (Register 2009, No. 3). 5. Amendment of subsection (b)(1), repealer of subsection (b)(2), subsection renumbering, amendment of newly designated subsection (b)(4) and repealer of subsections (d)(3)-(4) filed 12-31-2012 as an emergency; operative 1-1-2013 pursuant to Government Code section 11346.1(d) (Register 2013, No. 1). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 7-1-2013 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 6. Amendment of subsection (b)(1), repealer of subsection (b)(2), subsection renumbering, amendment of newly designated subsection (b)(4) and repealer of subsections (d)(3)-(4) refiled 7-1-2013 as an emergency; operative 7-1-2013 (Register 2013, No. 27). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 9-30-2013 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day. 7. Certificate of Compliance as to 7-1-2013 order, including further amendment of section, transmitted to OAL 8-2-2013 and filed 9-16-2013; amendments operative 9-16-2013 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(b)(3) (Register 2013, No. 38). 8. Amendment of section and Note filed 8-12-2015; operative 9-1-2015 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(b)(3) (Register 2015, No. 33).
What panels did with this rule
Released decisions that named § 30, with the passage each turned on. A panel decision persuades; it does not bind.
- ADJ21458754 · 2026-03-03 · Oakland District Office8 CCR § 30
Determinative passage · p.6With these principles in mind, we observe that the process by which a party may seek the issuance of a panel of QMEs is addressed in Rule 30 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 30). Rule 30 requires that represented parties submit a request for a panel of QMEs electronically to the DWC Medical Unit, and that they identify the following elements:
The Appeals Board emphasized that the correct claim number is the primary method of identifying a claim in a QME panel request and that strict compliance with providing a correct claim number is required, but an incorrect date of injury alone does not invalidate the request.
Official decision · page 6 → - ADJ20798821 · 2026-02-06 · Santa Ana District Office8 CCR § 30
Determinative passage · p.7III. Turning now to the Petition, we address applicant's contention that the QME panel requested by defendant is invalid because a UR deferral letter regarding treatment authorization in applicant's SI case cannot stand in for a claim denial letter addressing compensability, as required under section 4060. (Petition, at pp. 4-5.) Applicant argued that "the WCJ erred because the panel request did not arise from a compensability dispute and therefore could not legally trigger a § 4060 evaluation." (Id. at p. 5.) The process by which a party may seek the issuance of a panel of QMEs is addressed in AD Rule 30. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 30.) The Rule requires, in relevant part, that represented parties submit a request for a panel of QMEs electronically to the DWC Medical Unit, and that they identify the following elements: 1. Panel Request Information Section
The panel request was evaluated for compliance with AD Rule 30 requirements for QME panel requests.
Official decision · page 7 → - ADJ19167634 · 2025-11-07 · San Jose District Office8 CCR § 30
Determinative passage · p.3The process by which a party may seek the issuance of a panel of QMEs is addressed in AD Rule 30 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 30). The Rule requires that represented parties submit a request for a panel of QMEs electronically to the DWC Medical Unit, and that they identify the following elements:
The incorrect claim number and primary treating physician in the panel request denied due process and invalidated the QME panel.
Official decision · page 3 → - ADJ20508246 · 2025-09-02 · Pomona District Office8 CCR § 30
Determinative passage · p.5Requests may be made twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. For determining the timeliness of requests under Labor Code section 4062.2, requests made on Saturday, Sunday or a holiday will be deemed to have been made at 8:00 a.m. on the next business day. Requests made Monday through Friday after 5:00 p.m. and before 12:00 a.m. will be deemed to have been made at 8:00 a.m. on the next business day, and requests made between 12:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. will be deemed to have been made at 8:00 a.m. on the same business day.
Defines timing rules for panel requests made after business hours or on weekends/holidays.
Official decision · page 5 → - ADJ20165742 · 2025-07-18 · Fresno District Office8 CCR § 30
Determinative passage · p.8In sum, we believe that the better course is to require that parties strictly comply with the requirement in AD Rule 30 to provide a complete and correct claim number in making a request, rather than weighing and adjudging the individual facts and equity surrounding each incorrectly listed claim number in a QME panel dispute. In so doing, we seek to avoid the dangers of inconsistent outcomes, provide clarity to parties with respect to applicable minimum standards in requesting a QME panel, and allow parties to more easily predict whether a particular panel is valid without the need to seek intervention at the WCAB.
The Appeals Board emphasized strict compliance with AD Rule 30 to ensure due process and avoid conflicting QME panels.
Official decision · page 8 → - ADJ19203396 · 2025-01-21 · San Jose District Office8 CCR § 30
Determinative passage · p.7The WCJ argues that pursuant to WCAB Rule 30(b)(1), applicant is required to provide the proper claim number to obtain a QME panel. WCAB Rule 30(b)(1), states in relevant part that:
The rule requires proper identification of claim number and other details in a QME panel request, but the Board found the applicant satisfied these requirements despite using the specific injury claim number.
Official decision · page 7 → - ADJ18205051 · 2024-06-17 · Anaheim District Office8 CCR § 30
Determinative passage · p.4AD Rule 30 provides that when a represented party requests a QME panel: (b)... requests for an initial QME panel in a represented case, for all cases with a date of injury on or after January 1, 2005, shall be submitted electronically utilizing the Division of Workers' Compensation internet site.... (1) The party requesting a QME panel online shall: *** (C) Print and serve a paper copy of the online request, the panel list, and a copy of any supporting documentation that was submitted online, upon the opposing party with a proof of service, within 1 (one) working day after generating the QME panel list. Within 10 (ten) days of service of the panel, each party may strike one name from the panel. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 30(b)(1)(C).)
Applicant's proof of service did not show service of all required documents, so the QME panel was invalid.
Official decision · page 4 → - ADJ17029088 · 2024-03-18 · Oakland District Office8 CCR § 30
Determinative passage · p.9Here, there is no dispute that defendant's panel QME request listed an incorrect claim number. Because panel QME requests are available in litigated and non-litigated cases, a case number is not required to obtain a panel of QMEs. Rather, the issuance of a panel requires a claim number as a means for the parties and the Medical Unit to identify a claim and any prior panels that may have issued with respect to that claim.
Failure to comply renders the panel request void ab initio.
Official decision · page 9 →
Rules beside this one
Article 3. Assignment of Qualified Medical Evaluators, Evaluation Procedure — regulations rarely stand alone, and the answer is often two sections away.
- § 29Specified Financial Interests That May Affect Assignment to QME Panels.
- § 30.1The Request for Qualified Medical Evaluator Form. (Repealed)
- § 30.2The Request for Qualified Medical Evaluator Instruction Form. [Repealed]
- § 30.5Specialist Designation.
- § 31QME Panel Selection.
- § 31.1QME Panel Selection Disputes in Represented Cases.1 decisions