As the Legislature printed it
DIVISION 4. WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND INSURANCE [3200 - 6002] · PART 2. COMPUTATION OF COMPENSATION [4451 - 4856] · CHAPTER 1. Average Earnings [4451 - 4459]
How panels applied this section
Newest released decisions whose legal-standard extraction named this section. Each quotes the passage and links to the official PDF. Unofficial guide — not legal advice.
- ADJ12000811 · 2026-01-26 · San Francisco District Office§ 4458.5
Determinative passage · p.2FINDINGS OF FACT 3. Pursuant to Labor Code sections 3212.1, 4453 and 4458.5 the proper
Used to determine the proper permanent total disability indemnity rate.
Official decision · page 2 → - ADJ12000811 · 2024-05-20 · San Francisco District Office§ 4458.5
Determinative passage · p.3Regarding the rate of the permanent total disability indemnity, section 3212.1 states:
These statutes govern the calculation of the permanent total disability indemnity rate for peace officers with cancer injuries, including retired public safety members, and support awarding the maximum rate based on the date of injury.
Official decision · page 3 → - ADJ12000811 · 2023-05-26 · San Francisco District Office§ 4458.5
Determinative passage · p.5Regarding the rate of the permanent total disability indemnity, section 3212.1 states:
Official decision · page 5 →
All 3 decisions naming § 4458.5 →
Also on this
Unofficial guide — not legal advice. The statute is the state’s text. The quotes are litigated applications, not a prediction.
About California Labor Code § 4458.5
What is California Labor Code § 4458.5?
Labor Code § 4458.5 sits in CHAPTER 1. Average Earnings [4451 - 4459]. The statute on this page begins: If a member suffers “an injury” following termination of active service, and within the time prescribed in Section 3212, 3212.2, 3212.3. The official display is on LegInfo; this is a reprint.
Did WCAB panels apply Labor Code § 4458.5 in this corpus?
This corpus has 3 released decisions whose extracted legal standards named § 4458.5. Quotes and PDFs are on this page. That is not every case in California that ever cited the section.