The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Findings of Fact dated August 21, 2018 rescinded; substituted findings that contract for hire was formed in California conferring jurisdiction to WCAB.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
Joint Findings and Order issued May 13, 2019 is rescinded and the matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
The WCAB denied applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and granted defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, rescinding the WCJ's June 15, 2021 decision and issuing a new decision finding applicant remains bound by the AME agreement with Dr. Daniel Shalom and ordering discovery to continue with Dr. Shalom.
The Appeals Board granted defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the January 21, 2022 Findings and Order, and substituted new findings that applicant was properly notified of the MPN, did not establish refusal or neglect of medical treatment, and is not entitled to treat outside the MPN at employer expense.
The WCAB affirmed the February 4, 2019 Findings and Order denying jurisdiction under Labor Code section 3600.5, concluding no contract for hire was made in California either directly or through the applicant's agent.
The WCJ's July 16, 2018 Findings and Award is rescinded. The Appeals Board finds that applicant was employed by both Southern California Gas Company and Utility Workers Union of America, Local 132 at the time of injury, and both are jointly and severally liable for workers' compensation benefits.
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's findings on psychiatric injury, temporary disability, and permanent disability, deferred these issues for further proceedings, affirmed the finding that the cumulative trauma claim is not barred by the statute of limitations, denied the claim in ADJ8686996, and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings.
The December 20, 2021 Findings of Fact and Order is affirmed except as amended to order further development of the record with supplemental reports from Dr. Lee Lin and Dr. Cynthia Mothersole to address injury AOE/COE and temporary disability.
Petition for Reconsideration denied; Findings of Fact upheld that applicant was employee of Brothers Roadlines, Inc. at injury time and SCIF liable for benefits.
Petition for Reconsideration granted solely to amend the Findings and Order to admit applicant's exhibit number 3 into evidence; otherwise, the WCJ's decision is affirmed.
The WCAB rescinded the February 11, 2021 F&O, substituted a new F&O finding that applicant's claim of injury to his psyche is not barred by Labor Code section 3208.3(d), deferred all other issues, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.
Petition for reconsideration granted in part; Findings and Award affirmed except issues of right and left knee disability, cumulative injury disability, and attorney fees deferred; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denies the Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's findings that applicant met the burden of establishing injury arising out of and in the course of employment, and that the post-termination filing defense under Labor Code section 3208.3(e) does not bar compensation due to applicable exceptions.