The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The WCAB rescinded the April 5, 2021 decision and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision consistent with the opinion that defendant improperly discontinued medical transportation services without proper medical support and UR process.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's April 8, 2021 decision that defendant may not unilaterally cease inpatient care services at Casa Colina until a change in circumstances warrants a new utilization review determination.
The WCAB affirmed the Findings Award and Supplemental Finding and Addition to Award except for clerical corrections to credit dates of service since June 2, 2018, deferred ruling on sanctions and attorney fees for lien claimant under sections 5813 and Rule 10786, found lien claimant entitled to penalties and interest under section 4603.2(b)(2), and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.
Findings regarding temporary disability and maximum medical improvement rescinded and deferred; award of future medical treatment affirmed; matter returned to trial level for further development of the record.
Petition for reconsideration granted in part; June 16, 2022 Findings and Order affirmed except amended to defer medical treatment entitlement and order further discovery.
The WCAB granted defendant's petition for reconsideration to amend the decision to reflect injury to the neck and right shoulder and entitlement to select a secondary treating physician, but otherwise affirmed the May 3, 2022 Findings of Fact and Award.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's March 4, 2019 Joint Amended Findings of Fact and Award, confirming the award of home health care to the applicant.
Findings, Award, and Order affirmed except amended to find QME Dr. Wieseltier's reports not substantial evidence on apportionment; permanent disability issue deferred; applicant entitled to future medical care; issue of treatment outside MPN deferred; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings
The WCAB granted defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's Findings of Fact and Order, and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
The Appeals Board granted defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the January 21, 2022 Findings and Order, and substituted new findings that applicant was properly notified of the MPN, did not establish refusal or neglect of medical treatment, and is not entitled to treat outside the MPN at employer expense.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's December 30, 2019 Findings and Award, holding that defendant's UR determination was untimely and invalid, and that applicant is entitled to continuing outpatient rehabilitation services until no longer reasonably required.
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's Findings of Fact and Award in its entirety and issued a new decision awarding reimbursement for prescriptions recommended by Dr. Grace Reid on June 20, 2019 and July 15, 2019, but rescinded the award for medical mileage expenses. The Board ordered further record development on other disputed prescription expenses.
Petition for reconsideration granted solely to amend decision to find lien claimant did not meet burden of proof on injury AOE/COE; otherwise WCJ decision affirmed.
Findings of Fact of February 4, 2021 affirmed except Sixth Finding of Fact amended to grant applicant entitlement to further medical treatment; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings
Findings of Fact and Orders issued by the WCJ on August 10, 2020 are affirmed except amended to one finding that applicant did not show entitlement to treat outside the MPN.
The WCAB denied the Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's Findings that the employer did not neglect or refuse to provide timely medical treatment within the MPN.
WCAB panel affirmed the WCJ's decision denying the petition for reconsideration and confirming reimbursement to CIGA for bill review and utilization review expenses as part of medical treatment costs.
Findings and Award affirmed except as amended: applicant entitled to reimbursement for self-procured medical treatment at the amount provided by the Official Medical Fee Schedule; matter returned to trial level for determination of amount due under OMFS.
The WCAB affirms the WCJ's Findings of Fact, Award, Order and Opinion on Decision issued February 13, 2020, denying the requested right knee surgery treatment as not established medically necessary.
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's Findings, Award and Order Re: Lien of E&M Interpreting for services on June 20, 2006, and February 9, 2007, but deferred decision on the remainder of the lien for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
The October 18, 2006 Finding and Order is affirmed, allowing defendant to require applicant to obtain medical treatment within its Medical Provider Network regardless of the date of injury or award.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's determination awarding the testosterone cream treatment as reasonably required to relieve the applicant from the effects of his industrial injury.
The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that the applicant could select a new treating physician and was entitled to the recommended further medical treatment.