The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The WCAB en banc rescinded the WCJ's September 23, 2013 decision and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings to determine whether the spinal surgery is reasonably required.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCJ's January 24, 2011 decision is rescinded; the Bengals are dismissed as a defendant; the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and decision by the WCJ.
Denial of New Age Imaging, Inc.'s petition for costs affirmed; lien reinstated due to no formal dismissal; New Age must pay lien activation fee if lien pursued
The Appeals Board en banc rescinded the WCJ's Findings and Order of September 21, 2012, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings and new decision by the WCJ.
the applicant Escamilla's privilege to appear before the WCAB as a hearing representative is suspended for 90 days, commencing 45 days after the filing of the order.
The Appeals Board (en banc) affirmed the WCJ's August 7, 2012 Findings and Order, declining to exercise jurisdiction over applicant's workers' compensation claim based on the forum selection clause in the employment contract.
Petition for reconsideration dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and untimeliness; no final order existed to reconsider and the petition was filed beyond the allowed time period.
The Appeals Board affirmed its September 26, 2011 en banc decision, except it amended the decision to clarify that its principles apply prospectively from September 26, 2011.
The en banc decision of April 20, 2011, holding that non-MPN medical reports are inadmissible where unauthorized treatment is obtained outside a validly established and properly noticed MPN, is affirmed. Petition for reconsideration by applicant is denied. Petition for reconsideration/removal by Saldivar is dismissed.
April 13, 2011 Opinion and Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration vacated; petition for reconsideration deemed a petition for removal; removal granted; January 20, 2011 Finding of Fact rescinded and substituted.
Notice given that the Appeals Board may suspend or remove the applicant Escamilla's privilege to appear as a representative before the Appeals Board or any WCJ.
The Findings and Award of July 29, 2010, are rescinded and the matter is remanded to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's Findings, Award and Order Re: Lien of E&M Interpreting for services on June 20, 2006, and February 9, 2007, but deferred decision on the remainder of the lien for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Findings and Award of November 19, 2009, amended to defer permanent disability and attorney's fees issues; remanded to WCJ for further proceedings and new decision
WCJ's decision affirmed; AD Rule 30(d)(3) invalidated; defendant entitled to request QME panel after denial of injury claim; case remanded for further proceedings.
Affirmed February 3, 2009 en banc decision with clarifications and modifications; remanded both cases to WCJ for further proceedings on permanent disability issues.
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed its prior en banc decision regarding the rebuttability of the diminished future earning capacity (DFEC) portion of the 2005 Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities.
Petition for reconsideration granted in Almaraz; reconsideration granted on Board’s own motion in Guzman; briefing schedule set for merits and amicus briefsp. 6
Petitions for reconsideration granted; amicus curiae briefs allowed; further briefing deadlines set; pending further decision, all further correspondence to be filed with WCAB only.
The permanent disability-related findings are rescinded and the matters are remanded to the respective assigned WCJs for further proceedings and new decisions consistent with this opinion. The issues of permanent disability, defendant's credit against liability, reasonable attorney's fees, temporary disability indemnity, medical treatment, and medical-legal liens are deferred with jurisdiction reserved.
Findings and Order of October 20, 2006 rescinded; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings and new decision consistent with en banc opinion.
The Appeals Board reversed the WCJ's finding that the applicant rebutted the presumptive validity of the 2005 PDRS and remanded for further proceedings including rating under the 2005 PDRS.
Prior en banc decision affirmed except paragraph (c) of the Award deleted and Finding of Fact No. 9 amended to defer reimbursement for costs of Ann Wallace, Ph.D.'s testimony and report under Lab. Code § 5811; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings and decision consistent with this opinion.p. 9
The Board reversed the WCJ's determination that the applicant's spinal surgeries constitute an amputation and are entitled to temporary disability indemnity beyond the two-year/104-week cap, amending the Findings and Award accordingly and returning the matter to the trial level for further proceedings on remaining issues.
WCJ's Findings and Award affirmed; temporary disability indemnity awarded from July 15, 2006 onward under LC 4656(c)(1) measured from May 3, 2005 payment datep. 14
Reconsideration granted; prior en banc decision rescinded; WCJ's December 11, 2006 Findings and Order affirmed in its entirety, applying the 2005 Schedulep. 9
The October 18, 2006 Finding and Order is affirmed, allowing defendant to require applicant to obtain medical treatment within its Medical Provider Network regardless of the date of injury or award.
Reconsideration granted; WCJ’s finding that 2005 Schedule applies reversed; 1997 Schedule applies; matter returned to trial level for further proceedingsp. 5
The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's Amended Findings and Award, and substituted findings deferring the calculation of permanent disability indemnity and attorney's fees pending the California Supreme Court's decisions in Brodie and Welcher.
Applicant's permanent disability rated at 6% after 50% apportionment to preexisting condition under the new PDRS effective January 1, 2005; costs for vocational expert Ann Wallace's testimony allowed with jurisdiction reserved for adjustment; liens disallowed for non-industrial neck disability.