The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Released decisions
5,374
Matching these filters
259
Page
1 of 6
Released decisions259 of 5,374
Decision
Issues · outcome
Disposition
Open
ADJ292246 →Jul 1, 2026 · San FranciscoPanel decision
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB panel dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration as untimely and recommended the matter be returned to the WCJ to treat the Petition as a Petition to Set Aside the Order and hold a hearing to create a record on good cause to vacate or reinstate the Application.
Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of the February 1, 2021 Findings is dismissed as untimely. Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of the March 19, 2026 Decision is denied.
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as premature; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings to consider Petition as a Petition to Set Aside the OACR.
The Appeals Board granted defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the February 10, 2026 Joint Findings and Award, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings.
Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration is granted; final decision after reconsideration is deferred pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
Defendant's Petition for Reconsideration is granted; final decision after reconsideration is deferred pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
June 20, 2025 F&A rescinded; February 11, 2026 F&A vacated as void ab initio; applicant's second Petition for Reconsideration dismissed; matter returned to WCA for further proceedings.
The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the March 27, 2025 Order Dismissing Liens as void ab initio, and substituted a new order omitting Dr. Nehorayan's lien from the dismissed liens. The matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings.
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as premature; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings to consider Petition as one to set aside the OACR.
Petition for Reconsideration granted; Order Allowing Withdrawal of Attorney of Record dated October 27, 2025, rescinded; matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings.
Petitions for Reconsideration filed by applicant are dismissed as not aggrieved and because the Notice of Intention to Compel is not a final order or decision.
Petition for reconsideration granted; Notice of Intention to rescind the November 21, 2025 arbitrator's decision unless a complete record is filed in EAMS within 30 days; matter returned to arbitrator if rescinded.
Petition for reconsideration dismissed as the WCJ's denial of testimony motion was an interlocutory procedural/evidentiary decision, not a final order; dismissal affirmed by WCAB panel decision dated March 9, 2026.
The WCAB panel dismissed all petitions for reconsideration as successive and/or untimely and admonished the applicant regarding potential vexatious litigant proceedings.
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed as untimely and therefore the Appeals Board lacks jurisdiction to consider it; alternatively, if considered on merits, Petition would be denied.