The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
The WCAB panel granted reconsideration, amended the WCJ's decision to clarify entitlement to completion of care outside defendant's MPN, and otherwise affirmed the WCJ's Findings and Award.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The Findings and Award issued by the WCJ on December 28, 2020 is affirmed except that the award is removed and replaced with an order deferring the determination of lumbar spine surgery authorization to the QME and Dr. Dorsey.
The WCAB affirms the WCJ's Findings of Fact, Award, Order and Opinion on Decision issued February 13, 2020, denying the requested right knee surgery treatment as not established medically necessary.
Petition for Reconsideration dismissed; Petition for Removal granted; WCJ decision of 2020-11-24 rescinded and matter returned to WCJ for further proceedings
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's order requiring applicant to produce Social Security Disability documentation relevant to SIBTF's section 4753 credit claim, but amended the order to clarify the method and scope of discovery.
February 27, 2014 en banc decision rescinded; Petition for Reconsideration filed by applicant denied; September 20, 2013 Findings and Order of WCJ affirmed
The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration and ordered further proceedings and decision on whether the spinal surgery is reasonably required, pending issuance of a Decision After Reconsideration.
Denial of New Age Imaging, Inc.'s petition for costs affirmed; lien reinstated due to no formal dismissal; New Age must pay lien activation fee if lien pursued
The en banc decision of April 20, 2011, holding that non-MPN medical reports are inadmissible where unauthorized treatment is obtained outside a validly established and properly noticed MPN, is affirmed. Petition for reconsideration by applicant is denied. Petition for reconsideration/removal by Saldivar is dismissed.
The Findings and Award of July 29, 2010, are rescinded and the matter is remanded to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's Findings, Award and Order Re: Lien of E&M Interpreting for services on June 20, 2006, and February 9, 2007, but deferred decision on the remainder of the lien for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
The October 18, 2006 Finding and Order is affirmed, allowing defendant to require applicant to obtain medical treatment within its Medical Provider Network regardless of the date of injury or award.
The Board vacated its prior order granting reconsideration, dismissed defendant's petition for reconsideration, and denied defendant's petition for removal, upholding the WCJ's order denying the medical examination request.
The Appeals Board rescinded the May 6, 2004 WCJ decision and remanded the matter to the WCJ to allow the defendant a reasonable time to initiate the AME/QME procedure and for the WCJ to redetermine the applicant's entitlement to right shoulder surgery after completion of the AME/QME procedure.
The WCAB affirmed the WCJ's determination awarding the testosterone cream treatment as reasonably required to relieve the applicant from the effects of his industrial injury.
WCJ's July 21, 2004 Findings and Award and Order rescinded; matter remanded to trial level for further proceedings and new decision consistent with en banc opinionp. 13
The Appeals Board vacated the order granting reconsideration, granted defendant's petition for removal, and returned the matter to the trial level for an expedited hearing on defendant's Petition for Order to Restore Medical Control.
The Board rescinded the August 9, 2002 Findings and Order and remanded the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings and a new decision consistent with the en banc opinion.
The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision except it rescinded the appointment of Dr. Angerman as a medical evaluator and returned the matter to the trial level for further development of the medical record from Drs. Sobol and Berman.
The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision that the applicant could select a new treating physician and was entitled to the recommended further medical treatment.
Order Granting Petition for Reconsideration issued March 14, 1997, was vacated; Petition for Reconsideration filed December 2, 1996, was dismissed; removal was granted; November 13, 1996 Order denying multiple medical-legal examinations was rescinded; Petition for Allowance of Multiple Medical-Legal Examinations was granted; matter returned to WCR for further proceedings.