The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB granted defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's October 4, 2024 decision, and substituted new findings that the application ADJ18451814 was not duplicative of ADJ12117806, the presumption of compensability under Labor Code section 5402(b) does not apply, Dr. Jeffrey Nerenberg was validly obtained as QME, and discovery has not closed in ADJ18451814.
The WCAB granted defendant's petition for reconsideration, rescinded the September 22, 2022 Finding and Order, and found that the applicant's injury is not presumed compensable under Labor Code section 5402. All other issues were deferred to the trial level.
Petition for Reconsideration granted in part to amend injury findings by deferring all body parts; Petition denied as to post termination defense; January 25, 2022 Findings and Order otherwise affirmed
Petition for Reconsideration is denied, affirming the prior Findings of Fact & Orders that petitioner failed to prove employment and injury and failed to comply with discovery orders.