What the panel ordered
Petition for reconsideration denied; WCJ's finding that applicant is vexatious litigant and pre-filing order affirmedp. 1
Applicant seeks reconsideration of the “Findings and Orders” (F&O) issued on August 19, 2025, by the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ). The WCJ found, in pertinent part, that applicant was a vexatious litigant and issued an order requiring pre-filing review of all petitions filed.... The WCJ filed a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report) recommending that we deny reconsideration.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant repeatedly filed DORs and appeared demanding payment after settlement and payment were complete.
From the decision · page 3we agree with the WCJ’s determination that applicant is a vexatious litigant
Applicant repeatedly filed DORs and appeared demanding payment after settlement and payment were complete.
From the decision · page 9