What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration granted; WCJ's June 22, 2023 Findings and Order rescinded; matter returned to trial level for further proceedings and new decision.
Petition for Reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings and Order denying a medical lien; Board reviewed the record and WCJ's report.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Board could not determine whether the Request for Authorization was timely transmitted due to conflicting evidence and lack of testimony interpreting the fax report; substantial evidence was lacking to support the WCJ's decision.
From the decision · page 4review here because there was no testimony at trial or other evidence interpreting the conflicting
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
There was conflicting evidence regarding the time of transmission of the Request for Authorization, and no testimony or evidence interpreting the fax report.