What the panel ordered
Petition for removal dismissed as untimely and for failure to establish basis for removal.
Petition for removal from the Minutes of Hearing filed by applicant, challenging comments on the minutes dated August 28, 2025, and issued September 3, 2025 by the WCJ.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petition was dismissed because it was not timely filed and failed to establish a basis for removal, as removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring substantial prejudice or irreparable harm and reconsideration is an adequate remedy.
From the decision · page 1We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Removal and the contents of the WCJ's Report. Based on our review of the record we will dismiss the Petition for Removal as it was not timely filed.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
The petition for removal was filed on October 6, 2025, after the 20-day deadline which was September 29, 2025.