What the panel ordered
Removal granted to the Appeals Board; final decision deferred pending further review.
Petition for Disqualification filed by applicant's attorney; WCJ recommended denial; Appeals Board granted removal to itself for further review and deferred final decision.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board has discretionary power under Labor Code section 5310 to remove proceedings to itself as an extraordinary remedy; removal was granted to obtain additional information and defer final decision.
From the decision · page 1On April 25, 2024 applicant's attorney filed a Petition for Disqualification seeking to disqualify the entire Redding and Eureka District Offices from hearing an attorney fee lien dispute in this matter. Applicant's attorney filed an amended petition for disqualification on May 20, 2024.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant's attorney filed a Petition for Disqualification seeking to disqualify the entire Redding and Eureka District Offices from hearing an attorney fee lien dispute.