What the panel ordered
Further briefing allowed; final decision pending after briefing period
Petition for Reconsideration granted; further briefing ordered on applicability of Labor Code section 3600.5 subdivisions (c) and (d) in light of Atlanta Falcons v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Gandy) (2025)
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Appeals Board ordered further briefing to determine the impact of the Gandy decision on the applicability of Labor Code section 3600.5 subdivisions (c) and (d) to the applicant's claim, indicating the issue is still under consideration.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
The Raiders were a California-based team at the time they employed the applicant.
Favours Applicant prevailed
This fact supports the argument that the applicant was hired in California, which is relevant to the applicability of Labor Code section 3600.5 subdivisions (c) and (d).