What the panel ordered
The March 11, 2019 Findings and Order is rescinded and the matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings to determine if applicant was hired in California.
Petition for Reconsideration granted to further develop the record on whether applicant was hired in California during the relevant period.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The Board concluded that the claim is barred under section 3600.5(d) unless applicant can establish he was hired in California on at least one contract during the relevant period. The matter is remanded for further development of the record on this issue.
From the decision · page 1We have considered the Petition for Reconsideration, the Answer, and the contents of the Report, and we have reviewed the record in this matter. For the reasons discussed below, we will rescind the F&O and return the matter to the WCJ for further development of the record on the issue of whether applicant was hired in California, because we conclude in the absence of a
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.