What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied; WCJ's Findings and Award affirmed.
Petition for Reconsideration filed by defendant and denied by the WCAB panel, affirming the WCJ's Findings and Award of January 11, 2024.
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold March 25, 2024.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Applicant was an employee of the county fire department whose duties were not principally clerical, entitling him to the heart trouble presumption under Labor Code section 3212.
From the decision · page 2(Lab. Code, § 3212, italics added.) The WCJ found that applicant sustained presumptive injury to his heart arising out of and occurring in the course of employment pursuant to section 3212, as he was an employee of the fire department of the county and his duties were not principally clerical. (Joint Findings and Award, p. 2; Opinion on Decision, p. 2.)
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Applicant was employed by the Los Angeles County Fire Department as an ocean lifeguard whose duties were not principally clerical.
Favours Applicant prevailed
This employment status qualifies applicant for the heart trouble presumption under Labor Code section 3212.
From the decision · page 2(Lab. Code, § 3212, italics added.) The WCJ found that applicant sustained presumptive injury to his heart arising out of and occurring in the course of employment pursuant to section 3212, as he was an employee of the fire department of the county and his duties were not principally clerical. (Joint Findings and Award, p. 2; Opinion on Decision, p. 2.)
The rules the panel named
Authorities as the decision cited them, with how this panel applied each one.
Labor Code section 3212
Labor Code section 3212 heart trouble presumption
The presumption applies to members of city or county fire departments whose duties are not principally clerical, including lifeguards.
From the decision · page 1Labor Code1 section 3212 provides that heart trouble shall be presumed to arise out of and in the course of the employment as follows:
Labor Code section 3211.5
Definition of firefighter under Labor Code section 3211.5
The term firefighter includes employees engaged in firefighting services but is not limited to them, supporting the application of the heart presumption to applicant.
From the decision · page 2In addition to section 3212, section 3211.5 is also relevant to the issue of whether the heart trouble presumption applies to applicant.
The same issues, filtered across the whole corpus — or paste your own facts and let the search rank by factor match.
About this page
- A published decision of the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, taken apart by what it turned on. The Board publishes the decision itself; this page adds the extraction and quotes the passage behind every claim.
- The injured worker is not named here, and the case caption is not printed. Physicians appear as the decision names them, because a medical opinion is an act in a public proceeding.
- Issues, outcomes and weights were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. Read the official decision before relying on anything here. Not legal advice.
- If you are named in this decision and want this page removed, write to privacy@similarcase.com.