What the panel ordered
Petition for Reconsideration denied.
Petition for Reconsideration of WCJ's Findings & Order (Take Nothing) on lien claim after underlying claims settled by C&R.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
Dr. Rahimi's narrative report was inadmissible because there was no evidence she was designated as PTP or referred by the PTP, and her report was not incorporated or commented on by the PTP as required by AD Rule 9785(e)(4); thus, lien claimant failed to meet burden of proof for compensable psyche injury.
From the decision · page 4Based on the finding that the only reporting addressing injury/causation herein was inadmissible/stricken, there was no admissible evidence establishing that applicant sustained an injury to his psyche.
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.
Dr. Rahimi's narrative report was not requested by or incorporated/commented on by the PTP, and there was no evidence of PTP referral or designation.