What the panel ordered
Petition for reconsideration denied.
Petition for reconsideration filed by applicant disputing the finding that she did not sustain a compensable psychiatric injury during employment.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The applicant did not sustain a compensable psychiatric injury because the medical evidence showed her psychiatric diagnoses were predominantly caused by non-industrial factors, not work stress, consistent with Labor Code section 3208.3 requirements.
From the decision · page 3Applicant has filed a timely and verified petition for reconsideration wherein she disputes the Findings and Order dated 6/21/20222 finding that applicant did not sustain injury to her psyche while employed during the period 05/17/2006 through 01/11/2016 as an office assistant for the Department of Social Services. Applicant contends that the finding that she did not sustain an industrial injury is not based on substantial medical evidence
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.