What the panel ordered
Petitions for Reconsideration dismissed as untimely and successive
Petitions for Reconsideration filed by applicant on July 1, 2022 and August 1, 2022 regarding prior final decisions
This docket was decided more than once. Shown here is the latest released decision; we also hold July 18, 2022, April 21, 2022.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The petitions for reconsideration were dismissed because the first was untimely and the second was successive, which is not allowed unless newly aggrieved.
From the decision · page 1On July 1, 2022, applicant, in pro per, filed a document entitled "WCAB COMMISSIONER CLARIFICATION REQUEST" regarding our Opinion on Decision After Reconsideration issued on April 21, 2022 and, on August 1, 2022, she filed a document entitled "WCAB COMMISSIONER CLARIFICATION PENDING" regarding the Opinion and Order Dismissing Petition for Reconsideration we issued on July 18, 2022. We will treat both documents as Petitions for Reconsideration. Based on our review of the record, we will dismiss the petition filed on July 1, 2022 as untimely and dismiss the petition filed on August 1, 2022 as successive.