What the panel ordered
The Appeals Board affirmed the May 8, 2003 Supplemental Findings and Award of the WCJ, confirming the correct legal identity of the employer as 'Erez Boostan, an individual and dba American Runner Attorney Service' and denying UEF's petition for reconsideration.
Appeals Board granted reconsideration on its own motion pursuant to Labor Code section 5900(b) with respect to the Supplemental Findings and Award of May 8, 2003, to address the jurisdictional issue regarding the correct legal identity of the employer.
What was disputed, and how it came out
Each issue the panel decided, with the reasoning it gave. An outcome is what this panel did on this record — not a rule, and not a prediction.
The WCJ's finding that 'Erez Boostan, an individual and dba American Runner Attorney Service' was the correct legal identity of the employer was supported by substantial evidence and UEF offered no contrary evidence. UEF's petition for reconsideration was untimely and without merit.
From the decision · page 112 On June 24, 2003, the Appeals Board granted reconsideration on its own motion pursuant
The facts that decided it
What the panel treated as outcome-determinative, and which side it favoured.