California WCABInsurance carrier
Westport Insurance Corp.
Westport Insurance Corp. is named as an insurance carrier in 5 released California WCAB decisions from 2021–2026. The disputes run to Permanent disability rating (2), Liens (1) and Penalties under Labor Code §5814 (1). Defense most often ran through Hanna, Brophy, MacLean, McAleer & Jensen (3). The employer appearing most often is Alum Rock Union Elementary School District (3). The office that heard the most of them is San Jose.
- Decisions
- 5
- Years
- 2021–2026
- Issues disputed
- 3
- District offices
- 2
What they litigate
Disputed issues across the decisions this insurance carrier is named in. Every row opens the decisions it counts.
3 more firms appear in the same decisions and are not listed: we could not read which side they were on.
- Alum Rock Union Elementary School District3
- Ring Security Agency, INC.2
Where they appear
How the appealed decisions came out
These are decisions that were appealed and published — the tail of a system that mostly settles. Most claims end in a compromise and release or a stipulation and never reach a panel, so nothing below describes how this insurance carrier does its work. It describes how a set of appealed disputes came out.
Counted over 4 appealed decisions. Not this insurance carrier’s book of work.
Decisions
Newest decisions this insurance carrier is named in, each with the passage the panel turned on and a link to the official PDF.
- ADJ3516476 · 2026-01-26 · San Jose District OfficePermanent disability ratingapplicant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.1On December 24, 2025, we issued a Notice of Intent to Issue Opinion and Decision After Reconsideration (Notice), wherein the Appeals Board found that good cause existed to amend the disability rate of a prior award of permanent disability to conform to the stipulations of the parties.
The Appeals Board found good cause to amend the disability rate to conform to the parties' stipulations and affirmed the prior decision except for the amended finding.
Official decision · page 1 → - ADJ4316583 · 2022-05-09 · Salinas District OfficePenalties under Labor Code §5814mixed
Determinative passage · p.1Applicant and defendant each seek reconsideration of a workers' compensation administrative law judge's (WCJ) Findings and Award of March 2, 2022, wherein it was found that "Interest was payable to the Law Office of Vic Redula from the date of the Order issued on 2/22/21 until paid on 2/25/21" (Finding No. 5), "A penalty under [Labor Code] section 5814 is payable to the Law Office of Vic Redula on the unpaid interest" (Finding No. 6), and "A reasonable attorney's fee per [Labor Code] section 5814.5 is payable to the Law Office of Vic Redula...." (Finding No. 7.)
The WCJ found interest payable from 2/22/21 to 2/25/21 and penalties under Labor Code section 5814 and attorney fees under section 5814.5. The WCAB denied applicant's petition for reconsideration but granted defendant's petition, finding defendant had genuine doubt about liability and did not unreasonably refuse payment, thus no penalties or attorney fees under these sections were warranted.
Official decision · page 1 → - ADJ3516476 · 2021-04-23 · San Jose District OfficePermanent disability ratingapplicant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.24. Applicant seeks Reconsideration based upon use of the CVC instead of the Multiple Disabilities Table. Applicant is [] correct. Defendant contends that (1) it was improper to rely upon the report of Dr. Ng, which is alleged to be insubstantial, and (2) it was improper to rely upon the report of Dr. Graubard, which is alleged to be insubstantial, and (3) it was improper to rely upon the report of Dr. Gravina, which is alleged to be insubstantial.
The Board found the reports of the AMEs (Drs. Ng, Graubard, and Gravina) to be persuasive and properly relied upon, rejecting defendant's contentions about their insufficiency. The Board found no apportionment was proper as defendant failed to meet its burden of proof. The Board corrected the rating method from CVC to MDT, increasing the PD rating from 67% to 72%.
Official decision · page 2 →
Also recorded as
The same insurance carrier is printed several ways across the decisions, and all of them were counted as one. This is every spelling behind the figures above.
- WESTPORT INSURANCE CORP.
- Westport Insurance Corp.
- WESTPORT INSURANCE COMPANY
Is this your company and something here is wrong? Tell us and we will fix it. Every figure on this page is a count of released decisions this insurance carrier is named in, and the decisions themselves are listed above with the passage each turned on.
Also on this
Private workspace
Your case already resembles someone else’s. Find whose.
Paste the dispute. The extractor builds the factors, the search finds the decisions the same facts won, and the matter stays saved. Free account.