Legion Insurance Company

What they litigate

Disputed issues across the decisions this insurance carrier is named in. Every row opens the decisions it counts.

• AOE/COE2
• Cumulative trauma1
• Jurisdiction / venue1
• Liens1

Where they appear

• Los Angeles 3
• Santa Ana 2
• Anaheim 1

How the appealed decisions came out

These are decisions that were appealed and published — the tail of a system that mostly settles. Most claims end in a compromise and release or a stipulation and never reach a panel, so nothing below describes how this insurance carrier does its work. It describes how a set of appealed disputes came out.

• 3 for the defense
• 1 for the applicant
• 1 returned for more record

Counted over 5 appealed decisions. Not this insurance carrier’s book of work.

Decisions

Newest decisions this insurance carrier is named in, each with the passage the panel turned on and a link to the official PDF.

• ADJ8923383 · 2025-05-15 · Los Angeles District OfficeCumulative traumadeferred

  Determinative passage · p.1Defendant X-Ray Productions petitions for reconsideration of the March 5, 2024 Findings and Order wherein the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) found that applicant, while employed during the period of November 22, 1998 through January 1, 2000 did not sustain industrial injury as a result of cumulative trauma. Petitioner contends that the WCJ erred in failing to find a cumulative trauma. Petitioner argues that the evidence presented pursuant to Labor Code sections 5500.5 and 5412 establish a cumulative trauma with an end date of either December 5, 1998 or November 22, 1998. Petitioner also argues that the WCJ denied defendant due process by denying defendant the right to examine witnesses at trial and conduct discovery. Finally, petitioner contends that there is new evidence which should be considered by the WCJ.

  The Board did not rule on the merits but rescinded the prior Findings and Order and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings after the parties settled by Compromise and Release.

  Official decision · page 1 →
• ADJ8923383 · 2024-05-23 · Los Angeles District OfficeAOE/COEremanded

  Determinative passage · p.5The Applicant was a credible witness who testified he physically did not work for any employer as a production assistant, electrician, or grip after the specific injury of November 22, 1998 (Minutes of Hearing February 2, 2024, page 5, lines 3-6). Although the Applicant was compensated for work until approximately June 1999, the Applicant did not perform any physical work for the employer, but clocked in as he was owed "favors" from work he preformed [sic]on other jobs (Minutes of Hearing February 2, 2024, page 4, lines 13-17).

  The WCJ found no compensable cumulative trauma injury because the applicant did not perform physical work after the specific injury date, which is necessary to support a cumulative trauma claim. The WCAB granted reconsideration to further review the merits and record.

  Official decision · page 5 →
• ADJ2199336 · 2021-03-09 · Anaheim District OfficeAOE/COEdefendant prevailed

  Determinative passage · p.1Applicant, acting in pro per, seeks reconsideration of the Findings Awards & Orders (F&A) issued by the WCJ on October 20, 2020, wherein the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) found in pertinent part that while employed by defendant as a driver/furniture mover, applicant: (1) sustained injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment (AOE/COE) to his lumbar spine and psyche, during the period from October 9, 1999, through September 21, 2004, but did not sustain injury AOE/COE to his upper or lower extremities, and that the injury caused 21% permanent disability (ADJ2199336); (2) sustained injury AOE/COE to his lumbar spine and psyche, on October 8, 1999, but did

  The WCJ found injury AOE/COE to lumbar spine and psyche but not to other body parts claimed by applicant; the WCAB upheld this finding based on substantial evidence from AME Dr. Green and QME Dr. Jacks.

  Official decision · page 1 →

Also recorded as

The same insurance carrier is printed several ways across the decisions, and all of them were counted as one. This is every spelling behind the figures above.

• LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY
• Legion Insurance Company
• LEGION INSURANCE

Is this your company and something here is wrong? Tell us and we will fix it. Every figure on this page is a count of released decisions this insurance carrier is named in, and the decisions themselves are listed above with the passage each turned on.