California WCABInsurance carrier
Gulf Insurance Company
Gulf Insurance Company is named as an insurance carrier in 5 released California WCAB decisions from 2023–2025. The disputes run to AOE/COE (2), Jurisdiction / venue (2) and Statute of limitations (2). Defense most often ran through Dimaculangan & Associates (5). The employer appearing most often is Cincinnati Reds (2). The office that heard the most of them is Santa Ana.
- Decisions
- 5
- Years
- 2023–2025
- Issues disputed
- 5
- District offices
- 2
What they litigate
Disputed issues across the decisions this insurance carrier is named in. Every row opens the decisions it counts.
- Dimaculangan & Associates5
- Bober, Peterson & Koby, LLP2
- Chernow, Pine and Williams2
- Seyfarth Shaw2
- Chernow & Lieb1
- Colantoni, Collins, Marren, Phillips & Tulk1
- Goldberg Segalla1
- Guilford Sarvas & Carbonara1
- Littler Mendelson, P.C.1
1 more firms appear in the same decisions and are not listed: we could not read which side they were on.
- Cincinnati Reds2
- Pittsburg Pirates2
- St. Louis Cardinals2
- Arizona Diamondbacks1
- Baltimore Ravens Fka Cleveland Browns1
- Chicago Bears1
- Chicago Cubs1
- Detroit Tigers1
- Minnesota Vikings1
- Montreal Expos1
Where they appear
How the appealed decisions came out
These are decisions that were appealed and published — the tail of a system that mostly settles. Most claims end in a compromise and release or a stipulation and never reach a panel, so nothing below describes how this insurance carrier does its work. It describes how a set of appealed disputes came out.
Counted over 4 appealed decisions. Not this insurance carrier’s book of work.
Decisions
Newest decisions this insurance carrier is named in, each with the passage the panel turned on and a link to the official PDF.
- ADJ13556390 · 2025-08-13 · Santa Ana District OfficeJurisdiction / venueremanded
Determinative passage · p.10IV. Accordingly, we grant defendants' Petition for Reconsideration, and order that a final decision after reconsideration is deferred pending further review of the merits of the Petition for Reconsideration and further consideration of the entire record in light of the applicable statutory and decisional law.
The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further study whether defendants are exempt from California jurisdiction under Labor Code § 3600.5(b) and related exemptions, deferring final decision pending further review.
Official decision · page 10 → - ADJ9146501 · 2023-02-06 · Santa Ana District OfficeJurisdiction / venuedefendant prevailed
Determinative passage · p.5Here, applicant appears to have played four games in California during the course of his professional career, and also testified to participating in practices during a fifth trip to California, though he did not actually play in that game. Applicant does not appear to contest the WCJ's finding that he played in at least 146 games across his career, each with their own associated practices.3 Therefore, even viewing matters in the light most favorable to applicant, it appears that his total California exposure amounts to at best approximately 3% of his total playing career almost exactly the same percentage as in Johnson, where one game out of 34 also represented roughly 3% of the injury exposure the Johnson Court considered.
The applicant's cumulative trauma injury exposure in California was only about 3% of his total career, insufficient to establish a significant connection to California for jurisdiction under Johnson, and the exercise of jurisdiction would violate due process.
Official decision · page 5 → - ADJ9095459 · 2023-12-11 · Santa Ana District OfficeReconsideration / removaldeferred
Determinative passage · p.7For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of the Findings and Order issued by a workers' compensation administrative law judge on September 19, 2023 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of the Findings and Order issued by a workers' compensation administrative law judge on September 19, 2023 is GRANTED.
The Appeals Board granted both applicant's and defendant's petitions for reconsideration and deferred the final decision pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
Official decision · page 7 →
Also recorded as
The same insurance carrier is printed several ways across the decisions, and all of them were counted as one. This is every spelling behind the figures above.
- GULF INSURANCE COMPANY
- GULF INSURANCE
- Gulf Insurance Company
Is this your company and something here is wrong? Tell us and we will fix it. Every figure on this page is a count of released decisions this insurance carrier is named in, and the decisions themselves are listed above with the passage each turned on.
Also on this
Private workspace
Your case already resembles someone else’s. Find whose.
Paste the dispute. The extractor builds the factors, the search finds the decisions the same facts won, and the matter stays saved. Free account.